
I would also like to say that because of the blatant abuse by the pimple-farmers, I support removing the comment system, along with votes.

You are not mature, and it will take you a few, if not several years to realise just how stupid you are now. You are not smart, you are not wise, and you are certainly not tough because you posted something negative about a screenshot from a GAME. To all the pre-pubescent fools who post such things as "1st comment" or "this sux!!1!" - shut it. I felt naked kind of, in DC, when I played it for an hour or so a couple weeks ago w/o the UAV.

Being able to LOOK at somebody and press one key, one mouse button to spot an enemy and specifically what they are in, and their location all at once and so quickly is a god send. I do have to say that I -AM- spoiled by things in BF2 such as the CommoRose, UAVs, and guidable missiles. Battlefield 1942 had it's great parts, especially the variety of mods - but BF2 is new. I'm not sure which one I think is better. Reinstalled BF42/DC the other day and joined a server. I agree on the Grail-whores issue, but before 1.2 in BF2, aircraft was almost impossible to shoot down - made me want to kill for Grails, damn near. I never really did care for DC that much, but I played the hell out of DCX 72. I give it a 7, since 10s are hard to acheive, and this did evoke memories of BF42 and DC/X. I dont remember the last time i saw a screen from bf42 Posted by Anonymous ( ) at 23:01:27Įxpect a shortage of players on the BF2 servers The author should have at LEAST tured up his graphics for the screeny.

I've got my bell, I'm gonna take you to hell I won't take no prisoners, won't spare no lives and just add that to DC and you'd have the best game ever. Or here's an idea: keep all the squad and stats and unlockable weapons etc. I say that for BF2 EA should've just ramped up the graphics of DC.
